- What are the problems of judiciary?
- How can we improve Indian judicial system?
- Is judiciary an independent body?
- How can we stop corruption in judiciary?
- What are the weaknesses of Indian judiciary?
- Is judiciary really independent in India?
- Why is Indian judiciary slow?
- How is justice undermined?
- What are weaknesses for the judicial branch?
- What is Indian judiciary?
- What are the benefits of independence of judiciary?
- Is there corruption in judiciary?
What are the problems of judiciary?
The Judiciary is also beset by serious ethical problems, including an increasingly nepotistic mode of appointment of judges and elevation to the higher judicial benches, and cases of corruption and perversion of justice (Ogunye 2011)..
How can we improve Indian judicial system?
Some of the things that could be done to quicken the legal proceedings are the following:To increase the strength of the judiciary: … To keep courts open throughout the year: … Proper modernization of courts: … Introduction of fast track courts: … To do away with the archaic laws: … Non-acceptance of flippant cases:
Is judiciary an independent body?
Due to such authority, the judiciary of the country is an independent body. … This basically means that both the legislature and the executive branches of the government, cannot interfere with the functions and decisions of the judiciary.
How can we stop corruption in judiciary?
Adopt a phased approach to achieve sustainable results. Match ethics frameworks and oversight with actual disciplinary actions. Understand the political economy of corruption in the judiciary. Engage in dialogue at the decision making level, ensuring that reform is seen as capacity building and not as a threat.
What are the weaknesses of Indian judiciary?
Corruption. Lack of transparency (particularly in the appointment of judges). Under trials of the accused. Lack of information and interaction among people and courts.
Is judiciary really independent in India?
The Constitution of India provides justice for all. … The duty of judges is considered to be very pious, therefore the constitution has provided for independence of judiciary so that they can remain impartial to serve the constitutional goals, act fairly, reasonably, free of any fear or favor.
Why is Indian judiciary slow?
According to the National Judicial Data Grid, one out of every four trials in courts has been pending for more than five years. The lack of adequate personnel impedes the ability of the Indian state to maintain law and order, and effectively administer justice.
How is justice undermined?
Factors like coercion of suspects and witnesses, court delays, corruption and trial by media can undermine justice. … However, some suspects or witnesses may be coerced (persuaded through force or threats) to admit to something against their will.
What are weaknesses for the judicial branch?
Because congress can come up with the laws, the president (executive) can ensure laws get put out, the judiciary is weaker because it can only deal with immediate cases in the present. This is one weakness of the judiciary, which is basically told what to do and how to do it by the other two branches.
What is Indian judiciary?
The Judiciary is a system of courts which interpret and apply the law. … The Supreme Court of India, also known as the Apex Court, is the top court and the last appellate court in India, and the Chief Justice of India is its top authority.
What are the benefits of independence of judiciary?
It is very imperative to maintain the judicial independence as it keeps a check on the functioning of the other organs of the government and acts like a watchdog, it interprets the constitution according to the constitutional philosophies and it helps in resolving the disputes in an unbiased manner.
Is there corruption in judiciary?
Just like any evolving nation, India’s judicial system does have many legal loopholes that hide the corrupt nature of the protectors of the law. One of the major loopholes is that there is no provision in the constitution to register a case against a judge accused of corruption without the permission of the CJI.